Our criteria

What “uplifting” means to us

Choosing good news is an editorial act, not a sugar-coating exercise. These are the criteria we apply to every story — and hold ourselves to.

The essentials, in 20 seconds

  • Uplifting does not mean merely happy — it means real progress, recovery or solidarity.
  • We exclude, we do not censor — the hard news of the world stays with the outlets that cover it well.
  • We never republish the full text — headline, short summary and a link to the source, always.
01

Uplifting is not the same as cheerful

#

Uplifting does not mean merely happy or feel-good. A serious, even hard story can be deeply uplifting when it carries real progress, a recovery, an act of solidarity, a discovery, or genuine positive impact on someone’s life.

A survivor who becomes a doctor, a village that rebuilds after a fire, a treatment that reaches the patients who needed it — none of these are light stories, and all of them belong here. What matters is the outcome and the substance, not the smile.

The inverse is also true: a cheerful tone is not enough. A press release full of exclamation marks with nothing real behind it does not get in.
02

What we look for

#

A story earns its place when it carries at least one of these, backed by facts:

  • Progress — a measurable improvement: a disease in retreat, a river recovered, a record of renewable energy.
  • Recovery — someone or something that came back: a rescue with an outcome, a rehabilitation, a species returning.
  • Solidarity — people helping people, concretely: a community that organised, a stranger who stepped in.
  • Discovery — science and knowledge with a named benefit, even at an early stage, as long as the story says who stands to gain.
  • Real positive impact — a change that improves actual lives, not an announcement of intentions.
03

What we say no to

#

Some things stay out by definition, however many clicks they would bring:

  • Tragedy without an outcome — suffering on display, with nothing resolved and no one helped, is not a good news story.
  • Partisan politics — victories of one side over another are not uplifting; policies with proven benefit to people can be.
  • Clickbait and empty positivity — headlines engineered for the click, with no substance behind them.
  • Advertorial — paid content dressed up as news, whatever its tone.
  • Spectacle of misfortune — crime, accidents and misery as entertainment.

Excluding is not censoring: all of this keeps being covered — and well — by the outlets whose job it is. It simply is not ours.

04

The story belongs to whoever told it

#

We never republish the full text of an article. From each story we show the headline and a short summary written to be honest to the original — and a clearly visible link to the source.

The source’s name appears next to every story, the click goes to their site, and any source can ask to be removed at any time. Attribution is not a courtesy here — it is the foundation of the whole product.

See the criteria at work

These principles do not live on paper: they guide the classifier every day, story by story — and the sources that feed them are in plain sight.

Back to top